Childre Nissan Compares 2014 Nissan Altima VS 2014 Toyota Camry Near Gray, GA

Responsive image

2014 Nissan Altima

Responsive image
VS

2014 Toyota Camry

Safety Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The Altima Sedan SV/SL’s optional lane departure warning system alerts a temporarily inattentive driver when the vehicle begins to leave its lane. The Camry doesn’t offer a lane departure warning system.

Compared to metal, the Altima Sedan’s plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Toyota Camry has a metal gas tank.

Both the Altima Sedan and the Camry have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front-wheel drive, height-adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control and electronic stability systems to prevent skidding.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Nissan Altima Sedan is safer than the Toyota Camry:

Altima Sedan

Camry

OVERALL STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Neck Injury Risk

19%

33%

Neck Stress

216 lbs.

366 lbs.

Neck Compression

59 lbs.

135 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

32/46 lbs.

378/547 lbs.

Passenger

STARS

4 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

172

398

Neck Stress

113 lbs.

159 lbs.

Neck Compression

62 lbs.

90 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

537/329 lbs.

642/592 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

A significantly tougher test than their original offset frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH small overlap frontal offset crash tests. In this test, where only 25% of the total width of the vehicle is struck, results indicate that the Nissan Altima Sedan is safer than the Camry:

Altima Sedan

Camry

Overall Evaluation

ACCEPTABLE

POOR

Restraints

GOOD

POOR

Head Neck Evaluation

GOOD

GOOD

Peak Head Forces

0 G’s

36 G’s

Steering Column Movement Rearward

0 cm

7 cm

Chest Evaluation

GOOD

GOOD

Hip & Thigh Evaluation

GOOD

GOOD

Femur Force R/L

1.74/.01 kN

3.35/2.36 kN

Hip & Thigh Injury Risk R/L

0%/0%

1%/0%

Lower Leg Evaluation

POOR

ACCEPTABLE

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Nissan Altima Sedan is safer than the Toyota Camry:

Altima Sedan

Camry

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Hip Force

677 lbs.

818 lbs.

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Spine Acceleration

42 G’s

45 G’s

Hip Force

711 lbs.

880 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

For its top level performance in the IIHS moderate overlap frontal, side, rear impact, and roof-crush crash tests, and an “Acceptable” rating in the newer small overlap frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety rates the Altima Sedan as a “Top Pick” for 2014. The Camry is only a standard “Top Pick.”

Engine Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The Altima Sedan has more powerful engines than the Camry:

Horsepower

Torque

Altima Sedan 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl.

182 HP

180 lbs.-ft.

Altima Sedan V6

270 HP

251 lbs.-ft.

Camry 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl.

178 HP

170 lbs.-ft.

Camry Hybrid 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl. hybrid

200 HP

199 lbs.-ft.

Camry 3.5 DOHC V6

268 HP

248 lbs.-ft.

As tested in Motor Trend the Altima Sedan 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl. is faster than the Toyota Camry 4 cyl.:

Altima Sedan

Camry

Zero to 30 MPH

2.7 sec

2.9 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

7.4 sec

8.1 sec

Zero to 80 MPH

12.5 sec

13.3 sec

Passing 45 to 65 MPH

3.8 sec

4 sec

Quarter Mile

15.7 sec

16.1 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

89.2 MPH

88.4 MPH

As tested in Consumer Reports the Altima Sedan V6 is faster than the Camry Hybrid:

Altima Sedan

Camry

Zero to 30 MPH

2.9 sec

3.2 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

6.3 sec

7.6 sec

45 to 65 MPH Passing

4.2 sec

4.6 sec

Quarter Mile

14.7 sec

15.9 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

101.5 MPH

92 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

On the EPA test cycle the Altima Sedan gets better fuel mileage than the Camry:

Altima Sedan

Camry

2.5 4 cyl./CVT

27 city/38 hwy

25 city/35 hwy

2.5 4 cyl./Auto

3.5 V6/CVT

22 city/31 hwy

21 city/31 hwy

3.5 V6/Auto

The Altima Sedan has a gallon more fuel capacity than the Camry (18 vs. 17 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The Altima Sedan stops shorter than the Camry:

Altima Sedan

Camry

60 to 0 MPH

123 feet

128 feet

Motor Trend

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

141 feet

150 feet

Consumer Reports

Tires and Wheels Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

For better traction, the Altima Sedan has larger standard tires than the Camry (215/60R16 vs. 205/65R16). The Altima Sedan 3.5’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Camry (235/45R18 vs. 225/45R18).

The Altima Sedan 2.5/2.5 S’ standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Camry L/LE/Hybrid’s standard 65 series tires.

The Altima Sedan has a standard easy tire fill system. When inflating the tires, the vehicle’s integrated tire pressure sensors keep track of the pressure as the tires fill and tell the driver when the tires are inflated to the proper pressure. The Camry doesn’t offer vehicle monitored tire inflation.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The Altima Sedan 2.5 SL handles at .84 G’s, while the Camry Hybrid XLE pulls only .78 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The Altima Sedan 3.5 SL executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.5 seconds quicker than the Camry XLE (27.1 seconds @ .66 average G’s vs. 28.6 seconds @ .54 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Altima Sedan 2.5/2.5 S’ turning circle is .6 feet tighter than the Camry’s (36.1 feet vs. 36.7 feet).

Passenger Space Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The Altima Sedan has 1.2 inches more front headroom and 3.4 inches more front legroom than the Camry.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

A low lift-over trunk design makes loading and unloading the Altima Sedan easier. The Altima Sedan’s trunk lift-over height is 26.9 inches, while the Camry’s liftover is 28.2 inches.

The Altima Sedan’s standard folding rear seats are split to accommodate bulky cargo. The Camry Hybrid’s standard single piece folding rear seat is not as flexible; long cargo and a passenger can’t share the rear seat.

With its sedan body style, valet key, locking rear seatbacks and remote trunk release lockout, the Altima offers cargo security. The Camry’s non-lockable remote release defeats cargo security.

Ergonomics Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

The engine computer on the Altima Sedan automatically engages the starter until the car starts with one twist of the key and disables the starter while the engine is running. The Camry’s starter can be accidentally engaged while the engine is running, making a grinding noise and possibly damaging the starter and ring gear.

The Altima Sedan’s optional front power windows open fully with one touch of the switches, and the driver’s window also automatically closes, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside the car. The Camry’s passenger windows don’t open or close automatically.

If the front windows are left down on the Altima Sedan the driver can raise them using the key in the outside lock cylinder. On a hot day the driver can lower the windows from outside the vehicle using the key in the outside lock cylinder or the keyless remote. The driver of the Camry can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

The Altima Sedan’s standard power locks allow the driver or passenger to lock or unlock all the doors at a touch without leaning over, or reaching to the back seat. The Camry L doesn’t offer power locks.

The Altima Sedan’s speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The Camry L’s standard fixed intermittent wipers only have one fixed delay setting, so the driver will have to manually switch them between slow and intermittent. The Camry LE/SE/XLE’s manually variable intermittent wipers don’t change delay with speed.

Economic Advantages Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

Insurance will cost less for the Altima Sedan owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Altima Sedan with a number “3” insurance rate while the Camry is rated higher at a number “5” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Altima Sedan is less expensive to operate than the Camry because it costs $210 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost much less on the Altima Sedan than the Camry, including $34 less for a water pump, $15 less for front brake pads, $103 less for a starter, $2 less for fuel injection, $241 less for front struts, $965 less for a timing belt/chain and $192 less for a power steering pump.

Recommendations Comparison

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. LQPHD-I1ECN 162.241.241.35 2020/09/22

Motor Trend performed a comparison test in its December 2012 issue and they ranked the Nissan Altima Sedan 2.5 SV higher than the Toyota Camry XLE.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.