Childre Nissan Compares 2016 Nissan Frontier VS 2016 Chevrolet Colorado Near Macon, GA

Responsive image

2016 Nissan Frontier

Responsive image
VS

2016 Chevrolet Colorado

Safety Comparison

Both the Frontier and the Colorado have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height-adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding and available rearview cameras.

Warranty Comparison

The Frontier’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Colorado’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).

Reliability Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Frontier second among midsize pickups in their 2015 Initial Quality Study. The Colorado isn’t in the top three.

Engine Comparison

The Frontier’s optional 4.0 DOHC V6 produces 12 lbs.-ft. more torque (281 vs. 269) than the Colorado’s optional 3.6 DOHC V6.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

The Frontier’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Colorado are solid, not vented.

Tires and Wheels Comparison

The Frontier has a standard full size spare so your work or a trip isn’t interrupted by a flat. A full size spare costs extra on the Colorado Without the option you must depend on a temporary spare, which limits mileage and speed before replacement.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Frontier has a standard front stabilizer bar, which help keep the Frontier flat and controlled during cornering. The Colorado’s suspension doesn’t offer a stabilizer bar

The Frontier Short Bed SL Crew Cab 4x4 handles at .74 G’s, while the Colorado Short Box LT Crew Cab 4x4 pulls only .73 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

For greater off-road capability the Frontier has a greater minimum ground clearance than the Colorado Long Box Crew Cab (8.9 vs. 8.1 inches), allowing the Frontier to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Frontier’s minimum ground clearance is .6 inch higher than on the Colorado Extended Cab (8.9 vs. 8.3 inches).

Chassis Comparison

The Nissan Frontier may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs up to about 200 pounds less than the Chevrolet Colorado.

The Frontier is shorter than the Colorado, making the Frontier easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces:

Frontier

Colorado

Extended Cab Standard Bed

205.5 inches

212.7 inches

Crew Cab Short Bed

205.5 inches

212.7 inches

Crew Cab Standard Bed

219.4 inches

224.9 inches

As tested by Car and Driver while under full throttle, the interior of the Frontier Short Bed SL Crew Cab 4x4 is quieter than the Colorado Short Box LT Crew Cab 4x4 (74 vs. 78 dB).

Passenger Space Comparison

The Frontier King Cab has .8 inches more front hip room, .8 inches more front shoulder room, 1.6 inches more rear headroom and 2.8 inches more rear hip room than the Colorado Extended Cab.

The Frontier Crew Cab has .6 inches more front hip room, .8 inches more front shoulder room, .4 inches more rear headroom, 4.7 inches more rear hip room and 2.1 inches more rear shoulder room than the Colorado Crew Cab.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

A low lift-over bed design makes loading and unloading the Frontier easier. The Frontier’s bed lift-over height is 31.5 inches, while the Colorado Extended Cab’s liftover is 34.2 inches. The Colorado Crew Cab’s liftover is 34.5 inches.

A standard locking glovebox (which can’t be accessed with the valet key) keeps your small valuables safer in the Frontier. The Colorado doesn’t offer locking storage for small valuables.

Ergonomics Comparison

The Frontier has a lever hand brake in the console, easy to use while keeping both feet free and not impeding entry and exit. The Colorado’s foot pedal parking brake is not handy to use as a hill holding device with a manual transmission.

The Frontier (except S/Desert Runner)’s optional dual zone air conditioning allows the driver and front passenger to choose two completely different temperatures so people with different temperature preferences won’t have to compromise. This makes both the driver and front passenger as comfortable as possible. The Colorado doesn’t offer dual zone air conditioning.

For greater rear passenger comfort, the Frontier has standard rear heat vents to keep rear occupants more comfortable. The Colorado doesn’t offer rear vents.

Economic Advantages Comparison

Insurance will cost less for the Frontier owner. The Complete Car Cost Guide estimates that insurance for the Frontier will cost $370 less than the Colorado over a five-year period.

Recommendations Comparison

Consumer Reports® recommends the Nissan Frontier, based on reliability, safety and performance.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.