Childre Nissan Compares 2017 Nissan Maxima VS 2017 Chevrolet Impala Near Atlanta, GA

Responsive image

2017 Nissan Maxima

Responsive image
VS

2017 Chevrolet Impala

Safety Comparison

The Maxima has standard Active Head Restraints, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Active Head Restraints system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Impala doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.

The Maxima Platinum has a standard Around View® Monitor to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The Impala only offers a rear monitor and rear parking sensors that beep or flash a light. That doesn’t help with obstacles to the front or sides.

The Maxima Platinum’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Impala doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.

Both the Maxima and the Impala have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front-wheel drive, height-adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, available crash mitigating brakes, blind spot warning systems and rear cross-path warning.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Nissan Maxima is safer than the Chevrolet Impala:

 

Maxima

Impala

 

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

220

229

Neck Injury Risk

23%

23.3%

 

Passenger

STARS

4 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

129

412

Neck Stress

132 lbs.

132 lbs.

Neck Compression

56 lbs.

97 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Nissan Maxima is safer than the Chevrolet Impala:

 

Maxima

Impala

 

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Chest Movement

.9 inches

1.3 inches

Hip Force

286 lbs.

332 lbs.

 

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Hip Force

591 lbs.

855 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

For its top level performance in all IIHS frontal, side, rear impact and roof-crush tests, with its optional front crash prevention system, and its available headlight’s “Acceptable” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Maxima its highest rating: “Top Pick Plus” for 2017, a rating granted to only 46 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Impala has not been fully tested, yet.

Warranty Comparison

The Maxima’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Impala’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).

Engine Comparison

The Maxima’s 3.5 DOHC V6 produces 103 more horsepower (300 vs. 197) and 70 lbs.-ft. more torque (261 vs. 191) than the Impala’s standard 2.5 DOHC 4 cyl.

As tested in Car and Driver the Nissan Maxima is faster than the Chevrolet Impala:

 

Maxima

Impala 4 cyl.

Impala V6

Zero to 60 MPH

5.9 sec

8.7 sec

6 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

14.1 sec

24.5 sec

15.5 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

6 sec

9 sec

6.2 sec

Quarter Mile

14.4 sec

16.8 sec

14.8 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

101 MPH

85 MPH

97 MPH

Top Speed

135 MPH

132 MPH

149 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

On the EPA test cycle the Maxima gets better fuel mileage than the Impala Flex-Fuel V6 (21 city/30 hwy vs. 19 city/28 hwy).

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

The Maxima’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Impala are solid, not vented.

The Maxima stops much shorter than the Impala:

 

Maxima

Impala

 

70 to 0 MPH

168 feet

178 feet

Car and Driver

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the Maxima has larger tires than the Impala (245/45R18 vs. 235/50R18).

The Maxima’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Impala’s standard 50 series tires.

The Maxima has a standard easy tire fill system. When inflating the tires, the vehicle’s integrated tire pressure sensors keep track of the pressure as the tires fill and tell the driver when the tires are inflated to the proper pressure. The Impala doesn’t offer vehicle monitored tire inflation.

The Maxima offers an optional full size spare tire so your trip isn’t interrupted by a flat. A full size spare isn’t available on the Impala, it requires you to depend on a temporary spare, which limits mileage and speed before replacement.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Maxima 3.5 SR handles at .87 G’s, while the Impala LT pulls only .82 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Maxima 3.5 SR executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the Impala Premier (26.6 seconds @ .69 average G’s vs. 27.1 seconds @ .68 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Maxima’s turning circle is .7 feet tighter than the Impala’s (38.1 feet vs. 38.8 feet).

Chassis Comparison

The Nissan Maxima may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 200 to 250 pounds less than the Chevrolet Impala.

The Maxima is 8.5 inches shorter than the Impala, making the Maxima easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

With its sedan body style, valet key, locking rear seatbacks and remote trunk release lockout, the Maxima offers cargo security. The Impala’s non-lockable folding seat and non-lockable remote release defeat cargo security.

Ergonomics Comparison

The Maxima’s instruments include an oil pressure gauge and a temperature gauge – which could save your engine! Often ‘idiot lights’ don’t warn you until damage has been done. The Impala does not have an oil pressure gauge.

The Maxima’s front power windows open or close with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside of the car. The Impala’s front passenger window doesn’t close automatically.

If the front windows are left down on the Maxima the driver can raise them using the key in the outside lock cylinder. On a hot day the driver can lower the windows from outside the vehicle using the key in the outside lock cylinder or the keyless remote. The driver of the Impala can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

The Maxima has a standard locking fuel door with a remote release located convenient to the driver. A locking fuel door helps prevent vandalism, such as sugar in the tank and fuel theft. The Impala doesn’t offer a locking fuel door.

The Maxima’s standard speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The Impala’s manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted. The Maxima Platinum’s standard wipers adjust their speed and turn on and off automatically according to the amount of rainfall on the windshield.

A manual rear sunshade is standard in the Maxima Platinum to help block heat and glare for the rear passengers. The Impala doesn’t offer a rear sunshade.

When the Maxima Platinum is put in reverse, both rearview mirrors tilt from their original position. This gives the driver a better view of the curb during parallel parking maneuvers. Shifting out of reverse puts the mirrors into their original positions. The Impala’s mirrors don’t automatically adjust for backing.

The Maxima has a standard dual zone air conditioning allows the driver and front passenger to choose two completely different temperatures so people with different temperature preferences won’t have to compromise. This makes both the driver and front passenger as comfortable as possible. Dual zone air conditioning is only available on the Impala LT/Premier.

Economic Advantages Comparison

Insurance will cost less for the Maxima owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Maxima with a number “3” insurance rate while the Impala is rated higher at a number “5” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Maxima is less expensive to operate than the Impala because it costs $423 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost much less on the Maxima than the Impala, including $214 less for a water pump, $112 less for front brake pads, $3 less for a starter and $239 less for a fuel pump.

Recommendations Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Maxima first among large cars in owner reported satisfaction. This includes how well the vehicle performs and satisfies its owner’s expectations. The Impala isn’t in the top three.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.