Childre Nissan Compares 2019 Nissan Frontier VS 2019 Ford Ranger Near Atlanta, GA

Responsive image

2019 Nissan Frontier

Responsive image
VS

2019 Ford Ranger

Safety Comparison

Both the Frontier and the Ranger have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras and available rear parking sensors.

Reliability Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Frontier first among midsize pickups in their 2018 Initial Quality Study. The Ranger isn’t in the top three in its category.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2018 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Nissan vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Nissan 10th in reliability, above the industry average. With 19 more problems per 100 vehicles, Ford is ranked 16th.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ December 2018 Auto Issue reports that Nissan vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Nissan 4 places higher in reliability than Ford.

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

The Frontier has 3.1 gallons more fuel capacity than the Ranger (21.1 vs. 18 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

The Frontier’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Ranger are solid, not vented.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

The Frontier has engine speed sensitive variable-assist power steering, for low-effort parking, better control at highway speeds and during hard cornering, and a better feel of the road. The Ranger doesn’t offer variable-assist power steering.

Chassis Comparison

The Nissan Frontier may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs up to about 350 pounds less than the Ford Ranger.

The Frontier is shorter than the Ranger, making the Frontier easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces:

 

Frontier

Ranger

Extended Cab Standard Bed

205.5 inches

210.8 inches

Crew Cab Short Bed

205.5 inches

210.8 inches

Crew Cab Standard Bed

219.4 inches

n/a

Passenger Space Comparison

The Frontier Crew Cab has 3.5 cubic feet more passenger volume than the Ranger SuperCrew (101.1 vs. 97.6).

The Frontier King Cab has 1.6 inches more front shoulder room and .7 inches more rear headroom than the Ranger SuperCab.

The Frontier Crew Cab has .1 inches more front headroom, 1.7 inches more front shoulder room, .3 inches more rear headroom, 4.5 inches more rear hip room and 1.6 inches more rear shoulder room than the Ranger SuperCrew.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.